Nation Bulding in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq in the Framework of Realism

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Masetr of Political Science, ِDept. of Political Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, West Tehran Branch, Payam nor university, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of Political Sciences, Dept. of Political Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, West Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Nation and nation-building is a subject that is as old as human political history. In fact, from the point of view of political science, one of the pillars of the state is the existence of the nation. Today, not only governments receive their existence from their nation, but the legitimacy and internal power and the possibility of bargaining and reaching better economic and political positions at the international level for governments also with the nations under their domination. will be This has caused all countries to try, while creating grounds for strengthening their foundations and internal relations with their respective nations, to use international capacities in order to achieve the goals that their nations demand. From the point of view of realism, the strength and weakness of governments depends on their strength in bringing their people together for their goals, and in fact, there is a two-way relationship between the demands of nations and governments. This issue has caused that in recent years, the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, instead of focusing on the mere increase of military power and being under the shadow of the support of countries such as the United States, has tried to create a modern concept of the Kurdish nation within its borders and as a result, They have used international and domestic capacities to pursue the goals of the Kurdish nation (instead of focusing on militant groups), in order to improve the economic, security and defense situation of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Redefining foreign relations with the countries of Russia, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Syria on the one hand and redefining regional programs with the aim of improving economic and security relations are among the important things that have been carried out in order to form a new Kurdish nation in this region has taken. In this article, the nation-building process in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq and the ups and downs of the foreign policy of this region have been examined in accordance with the new goal of the media, focusing on realist theories.

Keywords


References
Abolhamd, A. (2019). Basics of Political Science, Tehran: Toos. [In Persian].
Ahamdi, H. (2012). Ethnicity and Ethnocentrism in Iran, Tehran: Ney. [In Persian].
Alibabaei, Gh.; Aghaei, B. (2013). The Culture of Political Science, Tehran: Zaman. [In Persian].
Ashoori, D. (2015). Us and Modernity, Tehran: Serat. [In Persian].
Bajalan, D. R. (2016). “Princes, Pashas and Patriots: The Kurdish Intelligentsia, the Ottoman Empire and the National Question 1908-1914”. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 43 (2), 1-18.
Borzoei, M. (2013). The Political Situation of Kurdistan from 1879 to 1946, Tehran: Fekre no. [In Persian].
Cheraghi, A. (2018). Analytical Review of America's Positions towards Independence of Iraq's Kurdistan (from 2003 to 2015) and Prospects for the Future, Master's thesis in political science, Razi University. [In Persian].
Dodge, T. (2021). “The Failure of Peacebuilding in Iraq: The Role of Consociationalism and Political Settlements”. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 15 (4), 459-475.
Edmonds, C. J.  (1988). ‎Kurds, Turks, and Arabs, Younesi, E. (tr), Tehran: Nobahar. [In Persian].
Entesar, N. (2011). Kurdish Politics in the Middle East, Ghaneifard, E .(tr), Tehran: Elm. [In Persian].
Ghorbani, A.; Ghadimi, A. (2012). “Strategic Study of US Foreign Policy in Iraqi Kurdistan and National Security of the Islamic Republic of Iran”. Strategy, 21 (1), 55-82.
Hafeznia, M. (2015). Political Geography of Iran, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian].
Hafeznia, M. (2015). Principles and Concepts of Geopolitics, Mashhad: Papeli. [In Persian].
Jongerden, J. (2019). “Governing Kurdistan: Self-Administration in the Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq & the Democratic Federation of Northern Syria”. Ethnopolitics, 18(1), 61-75.
Karami, A. (2014). Geographical-Political Developments of Iran's Western Borders in the last 200 Years, Master's thesis in political geography, Tehran University. [In Persian].
Kaya, Z. N. (2020). Mapping Kurdistan: Territory, Self-Determination and Nationalism, Cambridge University Press.
Kendal; Sharif, E.; Nazdar, M. (2000). Kurds, Younesi, E. (tr), Tehran: Roozbahan. [In Persian].
Kinnane, D. (1993). The Kurds and Kurdistan, Younesi, E. (tr), Tehran: Negah. [In Persian].
McDowall, D. (2004). Amoden History of the Kurds, Younesi, E. (tr), Tehran: Paniz. [In Persian].
Mehripoor, Z. (2002). “Iraqi Kurdistan and the Policies of the Islamic Republic”. Rafe, 3.
Mohammadi, H. R.; Khaledi, H.; Gholami, B. (2015). Geopolitics of Iraqi Kurdistan, Tehran: Entekhab. [In Persian].
Mohammadi, H. R.; Khaledi, H.; Salim nejad, N. (2010). “Northern Iraq Autonomy and Its Impacts for the Neighboring Ethnocentric Movements”. Geopolitics, 6 (17), 112-148. [In Persian].
Naghibzade; A. (2002). Developments in International Relations, Tehran: Qoomes. [In Persian].
Nikitine, B. (1999). ‎The kurd of kurdestan, Ghazi, M (tr), Tehran: Derayat. [In Persian].
Rafaat, A. (2016). “The Fundamental Characteristics of the Kurdish Nationhood Project in Modern Iraq”. Middle Eastern Studies, 52 (3), 488-504.
Rajabi M. The position of Iraqi Kurdistan in regional policy of the United States of America in West Asia”. Quarterly Journal of Political Research in Islamic World, 9 (2), 27-52. [In Persian].
Rashid yasemi, Gh. (2004). Kurds and their Racial and Historical Connection, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian].
Ronagh, A. (2005). Haditqe-ye Aman-allahi, Khayampoor, A. (eds), Tabriz: Tabriz university press. [In Persian].
Stevenson, J. (2017). “The Repercussions of the Iraqi Kurdistan Independence Referendum”. Strategic Comments, 23 (10), 3-5.
Tune, H. (2018). “Kurdayetî and Kurdish Nationalism: The Need for Distinction”. Zanj: The Journal of Critical Global South Studies, 2 (1), 43-64.
Vaghaye’ negar, A. A. (2005). Haditqe-ye Naseriye in Geography and history of Kurdistan, Tavakoli, M. R. (eds), Tehran: Arjang. [In Persian].
Watts, N. F. (2017). “Most Kurds in Iraq Support Independence. So Why Did Some Voters Stay Home during Last Week’s Referendum?” The Washington Post.
Wielecki, K. (2020). “The Contemporary Civilizational Crisis from the Perspective of Critical Realism”. Journal of Critical Realism, 19 (3), 269-284.
Wimmer, A. (2012). Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict, Cambridge University Press.
Woolf, N. (2020). “Is Kurdistan the next Dubai?” The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/may/05/kurdistan-next-dubai-iraq
Yack, B. (2017). The Myth of the Civic Nation, New York University Press.
Yavuz, M. H.; Ozcan, N. A. (2016). “The Kurdish Question and Turkey’s Justice and Development Party”. Middle East Policy, 19, 109-121.
Yildiz, K. (2004). The Kurds in Iraq: The Past, Present and Future, Feyzi, S. (tr), Tehran: Tavakoli. [In Persian]
Zaki, M. A. (2010). Summary of Kurdish History and Kurdistan, Roshan Ardalan, Y. (tr), Tehran: Toos. [In Persian]